To Kill A Mockingbird: Prejudice Is Part Of Our Inherent Nature :: To Kill a Mockingbird Essays

To Kill A Mockingbird Prejudice Is Part of Our integral NatureWhy did genus genus Atticus defend a nigger? What was the window pane of being the advocate for ablack man? It doesnt matter if their illegal or innocent, you basin ceaselesslyand effortlessly convict the animals for their colour vice. You bath even turn ablind eye to the obvious true statement. And so did the lot, the white, narrow-minded, bigoted and hypocritical people of Maycomb.The justification for why Atticus broke from the norm, and acted unlike mostothers in his community, can be compared to the fountain of the central characterin the novel, A Time To Kill, written by John Grisham. The comparativecharacter, a lawyer named Jake, also endangers not unaccompanied his own life but hisfamilys, by defending a Negro. He is compelled to undergo such a risk as hebelieves he is protecting an innocent man. Despite the fact that he is black.Jake could not raging with himself if he failed to give his utmost effort i nclearing the accused, Carl lee Haileys, name. The lawyer feels that it is hisobligation to humanity to do so. Similarly, the case Atticus accepts issomething which goes to the centerfield of a mans own conscience. Atticus isunable to treat the underdogs of the town how the mass of people act towardsthem. Clearly the people of Maycomb are narrow-minded, bigoted and hypocritical,and Atticus Finch is not. Nothing can be done to make the prejudiced, perversepeople hear the truth. This dogmatic attitude does not occur exclusively amid the whites and the Negroes either. The communitys unsubstantiatedstories about other citizens also demonstrate their heedless to the truth andprejudiced natures.Arthur Radley, otherwise labelled Boo, has for decades been maliciouslyslandered, in the county. The people that keep done so do not know Arthur, andthe reason they can make such judgments escapes me. When there was a series ofpets being mysteriously slaughtered, the consensus was that it was performed byBoo. Later, when the culprit transpired to be someone else, most people were fluid rooted in the belief that Boo was to blame. They could not believe thetruth. And all unsolved crimes committed, in the area, have been manufacturedsolely by him. If your tend freezes it is because he breathed on it and nutsand other fruits, grown on the Radley property, are considered poisonous. Whyhave these allegations been targeted on Arthur? All that distinguishes him fromother folk music is that he isolates himself from the community. Is privacy a crime?