analysis Thomas Hobbes?s claim ?a state of nature is, or would be, a st

Thomas Hobbes argues that a state of nature will at last become a state of struggle of everyone against everyone. According the Hobbes, the main primer coat behind this change will be the harsh competition over scarce resources caused by the nature of man. Through out this essay Hobbess reasons will be explained in greater detail.In order to sincerely yours hear the logic behind Hobbess claim, we must first understand his point of view of tender-hearted nature. The key element in Hobbess view on human nature was the importance of desires. Unlike numerous other philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle, Hobbes had a different approach to desires. He believed desires were real motive behind human behaviors. (Leviathan, p119) What motivated human actions were non virtues such as wisdom as Aristotle and Plato would claim, nor was it a sense of business as Cicero would say. It was rather simple desire. Hobbes did not see desire as a harmful feeling, which must be avoided. He rat her popular opinion of it as a positive part of human nature, which could drive a person to achieve more and more. Hobbes had a definition of happiness nigh connected to desires. Hobbes defined happiness as a continual successe in obtaining those things which a man from time to time desireth He used the verbiage felicity for this definition of happiness. (Leviathan, p.129) Important point here is, there is no limit to this attaining of goods and happiness is a continued process of desire fulfillment, which lasts from acquit to death.It would not be wrong if we claim all reasonable population would like to live a life of happiness or in other words, a life of felicity. Having accepted Hobbess definition of felicity, it underside be advertise said that all heap would want a life where all their desires are fulfilled.Hobbes argued that despite minor differences, all people were close to being the same in both ability and intelligence. (Leviathan, p.183) Hobbes further stated, b ecause people are close to being the same they also afford similar desires. This is the point where the problems begin. All people have similar desires for certain(prenominal) goods as well as the same hope of attaining them but unfortunately most of these desired goods are limited in numbers. Because there arent enough resources for everyone to fu... ...ostly take do by of their children with certain degree of love. Thinking that public would become enemies to theirs seems illogical. In todays world parents take care of their children not because laws force them but because they love them. This is an instinctive love necessity for the survival of human race and it is doubtful this love of children will be overcome by desire in a state of nature.The freighter line is that according to Hobbes, desires are the real motive behind human behavior. In order to live a life of happiness human beings must constantly fulfill their desires. But, because human understanding of good, s wingeing is interest based and the aim of rationality is no more than ego preservation, a state of nature with no authority to fear from turns in to a state of war where every one is against everyone. With the reasons he has provided, Hobbes has impute forward a good but not perfect argument. eventide though there are some flaws, he has done a good job explaining how competition for desires leads up to a state of war. However, this war to take place between everyone against everyone including families doesnt seem to be a realistic argument.