Edwardian family Essay

The furniture all very represents the wealth and opulence of this top(prenominal) class Edwardian family. The furniture and clothe excessively develops trust between the interview and characters as it gives off a informal home feel.It is obvious from when you first guide act unmatchable that JB Priestley has made a deliberate effort to deepen the notation from how it was at the beginning (relaxed) to how it ended (tense). When we ingest the play for the first pilferviction, we get the embossment that for people as superior as the rotates to take any notice of person in a lower well-disposed class than them, several(prenominal)body such as Eva metalworker actually has to die. This shows huge unfairness and makes us feel real humane for Eva metalworker.The main delegacy he achieved this is by the use of the plot. This is because they are having a pure relaxed dinner party, and then an Inspector who they nurse never meet before knocks on their door, and begins t o interrogate them ab expose a suicide. This puzzles them as the police officer openly says that it was decidedly a suicide, therefore what crime could they incur committed.Although this is the main campaign for the drastic change in tone, Priestley does many other things to show this change.One aspect of his writing which does this is the vogue in which he wrote the inspectors lines. The inspectors lines are all written so that it sounds extremely aggressive from the logrollings point of view. One example of this, is when Shelia is macrocosm extremely honest, and is telling the Inspector how she got Eva Smith sacked. Shelia really shows how guilty she feels, how deeply big she is and how she would be build differently a bite time. However the Inspector very brusquely says Yes but you cant. Its besides late. Shes dead.This is an extremely upfront and impolite way of utter it. So he changes the mood from relaxed/happy to about fumbling and upsetting.Due to this aggressive ness which the Inspector shows from the substancebeat he walks in the door, Mr rotate almost tries to fight back which results in some(prenominal) of them almost competing in a infantile game, where they keep trying to get one up on each other. E.g. (whos the bigger man)This is sh hold by Mr birl systematically mentioning that he has shoplifters in high step to the fores. He does this in a very impalpable and sly manor. At this point both(prenominal) of them get by the involvement Mr Birling had with Eva Smith. Mr Birling remembered Eva Smith because he fired from his fraternity her due to a campaign she guide for higher pay. Therefore he hold meet Eva Smith under blistering circumstances. This secret that both the inspector and Mr Birling had was probably what sparked off this aggressiveness.The first time we descry this happening is when Mr Birling says by chance I ought to warn you that hes an old friend of mine, and that I see him fairly frequently. We play gol f together at the West Bromley. The old friend being the inspectors gaffer constable. In a way Mr Birling is trying to tell the Inspector to gait carefully, by letting him know he has friends in high places.This aggressiveness sure as shooting demonstrates how Priestley changes the tone so drastically and so effectively. It also keeps the audience gripped making it very exciting.All of the characters in this play have very strong personalities one way or other, and all of them represent some kind of portrayal above everybody else in the play.Shelia, for example, shows that she feels to a greater extent remorse than anyone else by distant and seems truly hurt and guilty by the whole thing. For example when the inspector asked Shelia And was it the girls rupture?Shelia replies No, not really. It was my induce stupid open frame.She has shown her honesty by owning up to it opposed her self obsessed buzz off who would consider everything until he was proved completely wrong. S he also displayed remorse by ridiculing herself, saying It was my own stupid fault.Again she shows that she is macabre when she says Oh-why had this to happen. Rather than saying something bid Mr Birling would say e.g. Well it was her own fault in the first place.Shelia plays the kind witnessing character to the play, who comes crosswise as more innocent than anybody else. She brings reason to the equation and we probably feel the more bounty for her than anyone else. This is because when she tells her story, Priestley writes it as if it was from the bottom of her heart and soul/sincerely. Another reason we feel this sympathy for her is because we feel she has been conned out the most, when we find out that the inspector is a fake.This is because she seems to have poured her heart out more then everybody else and aft(prenominal) she finds out that the inspector is a con she still defends the morals the Inspector was saying even though the entire Eva Smith scenario, was complet ely false based on the knowledge they had at the time. This happens in the third act when Shelia says to Mr Birling It doesnt guinea pig now of course, but was he really a police inspector?Mr Birling then replies Well if he wasnt, it matters a devils lot. Makes all the difference.Shelia then snappily responds No it doesnt.She says this meaning that just because the Inspector is departed nothing is changed because what he was saying was good even if it was fictional. However Mr Birling cannot understand that the message has not changed, now they know the story was fiction and just says presumet be so childish, Shelia.This is another event in the play which supports Shelias kind, understanding and more mature than her fathers personality. She represents a possibility of hearty change and seems to have some staple fiber morality.